What this costs
Free, for now and in part forever
Nothing is charged for today. The course records, the published odds and one complete practice test will stay free permanently, whatever happens to the rest.
Why it is free right now
The scenarios have not finished clinical review. None of them has been signed off yet by someone who has completed the training, and charging for material in that state would be indefensible. When the review is done and the reviewers are named on this site, a one-off pass will be £59. Not before.
Planned
£59
once · valid through the 2027 selection window
Not a subscription. It does not auto-renew, and nothing takes your card details a second time.
Pay It Forward
10
funded places each cycle
If the cost is the barrier, ask and you get one. No means-testing and no evidence required — asking is the test. Funded places are identical to bought ones and nothing on the site marks them out.
Ask for a funded placeWhat you get
- Always free
Every course record
All 30 courses, sourced and dated, with the practice router. Free forever.
- Always free
One complete practice test
Ten scenarios with the full explanation for every response. Free forever.
- Always free
The published odds
Applicants, places and success rates from the Clearing House. Free forever.
- Free for now
Unlimited practice tests
The whole bank, drawn across domains so you never get ten on one theme.
- Free for now
Progress history
Every attempt kept, so you can see what actually improved.
- Free for now
Weak-area analysis
Which domains you consistently misrank, and what the standards say about them.
- Free for now
Research methods and statistics
The level selection assumes, with explanations.
Why this price, stated plainly
A personal statement review by a clinical psychologist costs around £160. An SJT-only course elsewhere in health selection costs £250. A printed question book is £21 to £25, and the application itself costs £35. £59 sits between the book and the human, which is roughly what this is.
It is also worth saying what the price is not based on. It is not based on what applicants can afford. Around two in five have held unpaid honorary or voluntary roles, most are on assistant psychologist salaries, and the BPS has published the argument that paid support for aspiring psychologists profits from desperation. That argument deserves a real answer rather than a discount code, which is what the funded places are for.
What this will never do
- No subscription, and no auto-renewal, ever.
- No claim that it improves your chances. Nobody can substantiate that, and pretending otherwise would breach advertising rules on instructional courses.
- No readiness score or probability of an offer. No course publishes how it weights anything, so any number of that kind would be invented.
- No referral or give-a-friend scheme. With around 6,000 applicants a year, that mostly hands free passes to people who would have paid, and reaches the people who genuinely cannot far less well than simply asking does.
- No gating of the course records. They are the most useful thing here and they stay public.